Advocate | Legal Blogger | Judicial Insights & Updates

  By Abhishek Jat, Advocate The Indian criminal justice system’s approach to FIRs and chargesheets is the result of a nuanced interplay between statutory law and judicial interpretation. Over the years, the Supreme Court and High Courts have delivered a series of transformative judgments that have clarified the powers of the police, the rights of the accused and complainants, and the supervisory role of the judiciary. This article presents a detailed analysis of these landmark rulings, reshuffling their order to offer fresh perspective on their collective impact.

By Abhishek Jat, Advocate Introduction Bail is a vital component of the Indian criminal justice system, serving as a bridge between the presumption of innocence and the necessity of ensuring the accused’s presence at trial. The concept of bail is rooted in the fundamental right to liberty, as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The process of seeking bail, however, is governed by statutory provisions, judicial discretion, and practical considerations that collectively ensure a balance between individual rights and societal interests. Legal Framework: Statutory Provisions Governing Bail The law relating to bail in India has undergone significant evolution, with the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), now serving as the principal statute. The BNSS replaced corresponding sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC), and introduced certain refinements to the bail regime. The relevant sections under the BNSS are as follows: Section 479: Governs the ...

Supreme Court Mandates Disclosure of Criminal History in Bail Applications Key Procedural Reform Established in Munnesh v. State of Uttar Pradesh By Abhishek Jat, Advocate In a significant ruling that refines bail application procedures, the Supreme Court of India has instituted a mandatory disclosure requirement for petitioners seeking relief under Sections 438/439 or 482/483 of procedural law. The directive came in the case of Munnesh v. State of Uttar Pradesh , where a Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging the Allahabad High Court's bail rejection was dismissed. The Division Bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan noted that the petitioner, arrested in May 2018 in connection with a murder case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, had failed to disclose his criminal antecedents, which included eight pending/closed cases and a conviction under Sections 379 and 411 IPC. The Bench observed that such non-disclosure constituted suppression ...