Posts

Showing posts with the label Bar Association

Supreme Court Shields Gauhati Bar President Amid Contempt Clash

Image
Article by Abhishek Jat, Advocate   The Supreme Court of India, on April 28, 2025, granted interim relief to Mr. Kamal Nayan Choudhary, the President of the Gauhati High Court Bar Association, by staying the contempt proceedings initiated against him by the Gauhati High Court. The contempt action arose from allegations made by the Advocate General of Assam, accusing certain lawyers, including senior advocates Anil Kumar Bhattacharyya and Pallavi Talukdar, of criminal contempt for making disparaging remarks against a sitting judge and the institution of the High Court during protests against the proposed relocation of the court to Rangmahal in North Guwahati. The Supreme Court bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta, allowed the contempt proceedings against the two advocates to continue but kept the proceedings against the Bar Association President in abeyance. Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, representing Mr. Choudhary, emphasized that the President was not present wh...

Supreme Court Mandates Unconditional Apology from Seoni Bar Association Members Over Strike

Image
Supreme Court Mandates Unconditional Apology from Seoni Bar Association Members Over Strike Author: Abhishek Jat, Advocate The Supreme Court of India has directed senior members of the Seoni District Bar Association, Madhya Pradesh, to submit an unconditional apology following their participation in a lawyers' strike in March 2024. The protest stemmed from dissatisfaction over the state government's decision to allocate land for a new District Court Complex without consulting the legal fraternity. This ruling underscores the Apex Court’s firm stance against disruptions in judicial proceedings due to strikes by legal professionals. Background of the Case The case arose when the Madhya Pradesh High Court imposed disciplinary action on ten lawyers from the Seoni District Bar Association, barring them from appearing in court for one month and preventing them from contesting Bar Association and Bar Council elections for three years. The penalty was a response to their call for a thr...