Advocate | Legal Blogger | Judicial Insights & Updates

By Abhishek Jat, Advocate Case Title: Rajesh Chaddha v. State of Uttar Pradesh Citation: Criminal Appeal No(s). of 2025 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 2353-2354 of 2019] Bench: Justice Satish Chandra Sharma Factual Matrix The Supreme Court addressed an appeal arising from a protracted dowry-related prosecution, where the appellant, Rajesh Chaddha, had been convicted under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. The complainant, Mala Chaddha, had alleged persistent mental and physical harassment for dowry by her husband and in-laws. The prosecution’s case relied primarily on the testimonies of the complainant and her father, with no corroborative medical or documentary evidence to substantiate the allegations of physical cruelty or miscarriage. Procedural History The trial court acquitted the appellant of charges under Sections 323/34 and 506 IPC due to lack of evidence but convicted him under Section 498A IPC and Section 4 of the...

  Supreme Court Upholds Costs for Vexatious Litigation: A Cautionary Tale for Misusing Judicial Process By Abhishek Jat, Advocate In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court of India has reinforced the judiciary's stance against frivolous and vexatious litigation, emphasizing that courts are justified in imposing costs when parties attempt to misuse the judicial process. The case of  Leelawati (Dead) Thr. LRS. vs. State of U.P. & Ors.  serves as a stark reminder that the courts will not tolerate attempts to obtain orders through deceit or manipulation. Background of the Case The dispute originated from an eviction suit filed by the appellant, Leelawati, against her tenant on the grounds of  bona fide need . Initially, the prescribed authority under the Rent Act ruled in her favor. However, the tenant successfully appealed the decision, citing the appellant's failure to prove ownership of the property. Aggrieved by this reversal, Leelawati approached the Allaha...